In Wendy Leibowitz’s “Technology Transforms Writing and the Teaching of Writing”, she claims that writing with technology can have both positive and negative consequences. One negative consequence presented about using technology when writing is how student’s essays are longer but worse. Leibowitz stated “Many students do not revise or even proofread their work, relying instead on software to check spelling and grammar” (Leibowitz 137). I have been a victim of this exact statement, many times while I am typing I will just continue to type and forget to read what I just typed. Then when I receive my draft back, the teacher has noticed mistakes that I would have noticed if I would have proofread my work. Since I have experienced this, I now reread my work before I submit it. Also when using technology, I feel as if I’m not putting all of my thoughts into my paper. Now I write my ideas out before typing them to get the full effect of my typing. Although using technology has negative consequences it also has positive consequences.
One negative consequence presented about using technology when writing is how it reduces the intimidation factor inhibited when writing. Sven Birkets, a lecturer in writing at Mount Holyoke College, said “The good thing that everyone always says about technology is that it seems to reduce the initial intimidation factor in writing itself” (Leibowitz 138). When writing, I tend to misspell words due to the majority of my brain being focused on thoughts. Technology displays the words that are misspelled and allow you to choose the correct spelling of the word. I also tend to have run on sentences when typing and again technology display the mistake and allow you to fix it. This reduces the intimidation factor of me misspelling words or having run on sentences.
So as Leibowitz claimed, technology can have both positive and negative consequences. It just determines on what type of writer a person is. Whether their ideas and work ethic prospers when writing on paper or when using technology.